RC Hovercraft?

Welcome to RCTalk

Come join other RC enthusiasts! You'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Wabatuckian

RCTalk Rookie
Messages
18
Reaction score
13
When I was a kid, I had a Typhoon hovercraft:


It was fun, but took forever to charge and didn't run long.

Figuring on improved battery tech, I tried shopping around for a hobby-level hovercraft kit, but don't see any. Just toys.

Am I not looking in the right places, or did they fail to catch on?
 
If anyone would have one it would be old school Kyosho. They had the blizzard and the Tom's river airboat. Seems right up there alley.
 
There was a 1/110th scale "Zubr-class" hovercraft model on Hobbyking, can still find it on Aliexpress. I loved the idea of an RC hovercraft as a kid, they are the perfect demo toy for an indoor mall.

It seems to lack the power to hover over water, instead just kind of floating and blowing bubbles through the skirt. Maybe some power upgrades would fix that issue. Edit: Or just moving some weight rearward, it appears to be front-heavy.

 
Last edited:
There was a 1/110th scale "Zubr-class" hovercraft model on Hobbyking, can still find it on Aliexpress. I loved the idea of an RC hovercraft as a kid, they are the perfect demo toy for an indoor mall.

The videos aren't encouraging though, it seems to lack the power to hover over water, instead just kind of floating and blowing bubbles through the skirt. Maybe some power upgrades would fix that issue.


I'm not sure the rubber-skirt hovercraft concept "works" in miniature. They need exceptionally flat surfaces, perform poorly even on perfectly still water, and grass is out of the question.

They don't seem to perform any better than RC airboats. Most RC hovercraft seems like they would work just as well if the hull were a big block of plain styrofoam with air being blown under it, which is also (perhaps unsurprisingly) a popular design for DIY model hovercraft.

Edit: thinking about it, the problem seems to be that an RC model just doesn't have enough surface area underneath it to "trap" a meaningful cushion of air.

The perimeter:area ratio of a 1/110th scale RC is 110 times worse than on the full sized model, this means the miniature is losing air through the skirt 100 times faster than the full-sized model does, relative to the amount of lift that air provides before it escapes.

Also interesting, a hovercraft must have displacement, in the form of a "depression" in the water underneath it. It makes sense that a miniature hovercraft will struggle to maintain this depression, and instead sink until its own buoyancy through traditional displacement is enough.
Almost seems like this runs better on the bricks than it does the water.
 
Almost seems like this runs better on the bricks than it does the water.
That's true, it does look very realistic even over the somewhat uneven bricks. Good on them to be up-front about its real performance and not conceal that in the video, but I think they could've done more to show us some more hard-surface footage, especially considering that's Hobbyking's own video intended to promote the vehicle.
 
not sure what kinda lift that thing has but it needs way more .should float on a cushion of air not be a skirt dragger.
 
There was a 1/110th scale "Zubr-class" hovercraft model on Hobbyking, can still find it on Aliexpress. I loved the idea of an RC hovercraft as a kid, they are the perfect demo toy for an indoor mall.

The videos aren't encouraging though, it seems to lack the power to hover over water, instead just kind of floating and blowing bubbles through the skirt. Maybe some power upgrades would fix that issue. Edit: Or just moving some weight rearward, it appears to be front-heavy.


I'm not sure the rubber-skirt hovercraft concept "works" in miniature. They need exceptionally flat surfaces, perform poorly even on perfectly still water, and grass is out of the question.

They don't seem to perform any better than RC airboats. Most RC hovercraft seems like they would work just as well if the hull were a big block of plain styrofoam with air being blown under it, which is also (perhaps unsurprisingly) a popular design for DIY model hovercraft.

Edit: thinking about it, the problem seems to be that an RC model just doesn't have enough surface area underneath it to "trap" a meaningful cushion of air.

The perimeter:area ratio of a 1/110th scale RC is 110 times worse than on the full sized model, this means the miniature is losing air through the skirt 100 times faster than the full-sized model does, relative to the amount of lift that air provides before it escapes.

Also interesting, a hovercraft must have displacement, in the form of a "depression" in the water underneath it. It makes sense that a miniature hovercraft will struggle to maintain this depression, and instead sink until its own buoyancy through traditional displacement is enough.

My Typhoon sure worked really well. It ran best on gymnasium floors, but ran almost all well on water -- it didn't drag the skirt. It was also really fast, but took a while to reach top speed.

It definitely out-performed that thing in the video.
 
My Typhoon sure worked really well. It ran best on gymnasium floors, but ran almost all well on water -- it didn't drag the skirt. It was also really fast, but took a while to reach top speed.

It definitely out-performed that thing in the video.

That's encouraging to hear, I may have been too cynical.
 
I recently bought a green Typhoon 2 off Ebay. Everything worked and the bladder was still intact. Cost me $50 and it's been driving my dogs crazy
 
When I was a kid my dad used to pester me to go to the local lending library to get me to read literature. It was a good idea of course, except I discovered loads of really interesting books on model making printed during the 1940’s and 50,s. Very little on RC but wow they made assorts of guided and unguided boats, cars, planes, and hovercraft, they seemed to have something of an obsession with them, new technology I guess!

I must see if I can track down some plans, they used small IC engines for lift
 

Similar threads

Back
Top