LOW-LIFE
RCTalk Basher
I wish I could test mine like K&N did. They've claimed that they over oiled a filter and then pulled 1000CFM thru it and used a second filter to catch what might have came off the primary. Apparently this is how API or some standards body tests regular filters, by weighing a second filter, doing the test with both filters, then weighing the second again. If it's weight has increased, the primary has let stuff thru.
K&N claims that they had no oil on the secondary filter.
...but I'm not gonna push it ;-)
I did notice my filter looks a bit rattier than new, so I'm keeping an eye on it and have it's replacement in the cab now.
thats an interesting way of testing them but seems there could be a better way, i dunno i dont really care i run wix in my vehicles or a DRY element AEM or amsoil filter.
if yours is showing wear warranty that bitch out and get it replaced, it is free to you, safer than sorry i say.
Thats a lot of boost, what exactly have you done to the engine?
meh, my 4th gen eclipse GSX (i think 4th gen it was a 98) was making 22lbs on a stock engine with upgraded turbo, exhaust and intercooler. also had injectors to fuel it and was professionally dyno tuned, could of had more but the exhaust side of the turbo was restrictive and was shotting the EGT's sky high.
I'm running around 30lbs of boost, Bone stock. So the 26lbs of squirrel farts from your lil mitsubishi isnt saying too much. Still sounds like a family of racoons stuck in a garbage can.
lol awesome
i think my cummins makes 18-20lbs stock i dunno I'm at 45psi now with a stock turbo just by adding a programmer and some injectors and waaaay out of the turbo efficency range.
the traction comments....uh...awd
the 1.5L comment...againt further proves none of you have any idea of what your where talking about....every evo is 2.0L.. while not much bigger than previously stated....that engine still is one of the most powerful engines for a CAR per cylinder
and yes KN is cotton...
anyways...back to subject...still wouldnt use a k/n on the revo
and all i was trying to say was that earlier there were comments that k/n filters are crap...not true for gas powered CARS
so back to thinking you are all right and post some more videos of 18 wheelers pulling stuff...while i will see all you in my rear view mirror
I'm 4x4 ill race you... and win...
I knew the evo was a 2.0, its basically a 4G63 depending on the year you have.
CAN be one of the most powerfull per cylinder, i still think after my side to side comparrison a subi WRX is a better all around car and dominates on handling. but i dont own either just sayin as to further de rail this thread that is becoming awesome.
i drive a DIESEL powered vehicle.
oh and by the way..... you would never get away from me. Far better men than you have tried.
diesel is the shiz. i have a 82 BJ42 Toyota land cruiser that was imported from canada with a factory diesel.
and ill bet i could get away from you, far better 6 liters have tried
Back to the original topic:
For RC nitro engines, the K&N filters don't provide enough filtering to keep most of the smaller particulates that damage these engines out of the engine. Don't use them when running.
I totally agree with Ham....not for RC vehicles. They are a death sentence.
agreed and agreed again.